"had to", nope.

Paid for, yep.

Their, (the sherpa's), decision to make.

"Almost no American schoolchildren learn that segregation has been government policy." For that matter neither do adults.

Or the authors/promoters of the bulk of it. A thing I have referred to, a few times, during my time here

"Victims",,,,,,,"Liberals"

Same same.

Yep, optics.

Whose?

Live it.

Embrace it.

BS.

Money drives/buys tech,,,,,,, ,period.

Network all you wish, our every communication, monitored and paid for, by us.,,,,,,,,LOL

Really?

Too blatant for CNN?

LOL

Then there's this:,,,,,,,," Reports of mismanagement and pervasive corruption -- Afghans flying off with suitcases of foreign aid cash to buy luxury villas in Dubai or Ugandan Prime Minister Patrick Amama Mbabazi forced to apologize when his staff stole $13 million in aid money -- feed the perception that foreign aid is not money well spent."

Kinda like sittin around the ole sewin circle,,,,,,,,,,,,eh gals?

You may like who you wish. My comments re: Adelle are based on observation and verified by his manners/behavior, nothing more.

Thank you App, of course not part of the article.

LOL

I reckon Adelle is still fumbling for his meds.

I reckon you would just have to re-read the article. That dyslexia can be a bitch, I understand. Take your Ritalin, Adderall or whatever.

LOL

One tenth they lost from post-election sell offs.

LOL

Until her/their next military request.

"Gate", lends gravitas.

LOL

Yep, you should have.

The article ,wrongly but clearly, states he was provoked by Trump's statements.

"Only that they're fellow anti-Muslim bigots.", good to see you out of the closet.

The problem with this report is that the perp was not a supporter, but rather a detractor, of Trump.

"Part of another country"

To just which are they a part now?

It's

apt.

Yep, that and two scoops are eminently newsworthy.

LOL

"But immigration proceedings are matters of administrative law, not criminal law. (As a result, the consequence of violating your immigration status is not jail but deportation.) And Congress has nearly full authority to regulate immigration without interference from the courts. Because immigration is considered a matter of national security and foreign policy, the Supreme Court has long held that immigration law is largely immune from judicial review"

"............ have no legal right to intrude on the prerogatives of the executive branch, which Congress has vested with near-unfettered discretion to administer immigration laws and policy."