+52 52 0
Published 7 years ago by Gozzin with 27 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
Conversation 20 comments by 5 users
  • MAGISTERLUDI
    +1

    Coincidence that all these women made their allegations at the same time. Really folks, everyone knows who's behind this. It is their same m.o. every four years.

    Meanwhile WikiLeaks is releasing some potent emails, of course you haven't heard, most are not even aware.

    • AdelleChattre
      +7

      So Donald Trump was lying about his serial sexual assaults?

      • MAGISTERLUDI
        +2

        Really? No where in my comment did I address Trump's braggadocio.

        Keep your blinders on and deflect.

        • RoamingGnome (edited 7 years ago)
          +10

          It is simply astounding to me that you can sit there and say one the one hand that Trump ADMITS to groping women without consent, but when the women come forward they are liars. Somebody in this conversation has blinders on, that's for damned sure.

          • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
            +2

            Your making the "leap" that the women of his conversation(s) and these women who just came forward are the same. The one who read the script was repeating Juanita Broaddrick's story verbatim.

            You all say he's guilty, makes it so

            You've broke me down;-(......LOL

            • RoamingGnome (edited 7 years ago)
              +8

              He said he is guilty, we are merely supporting his confession and assuming that this time he's actually telling the truth. You do, of course, realize that the fact that he admitted to groping women means that there are women out there who were groped? Why are you so surprised that some are coming forward right now? This isn't "convenient" timing in any way, shape or form; the story broke and women came forward. You could argue that the breaking of the story was pretty convenient, but not the women coming forward.

            • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
              +1
              @RoamingGnome -

              "You could argue that the breaking of the story was pretty convenient, but not the women coming forward." Already done that

              Please supply all the corroborating evidence you have that Trump assaulted the women who just came forward. Don't omit the Juanita Broaddrick script read by one of Trump's alleged victims. LOL

              We're waiting. The national, foreign press/media, pretty much everyone

            • RoamingGnome
              +5
              @MAGISTERLUDI -

              Sorry, I have no more time for your idiotic little game. Have a nice life.

        • AdelleChattre
          +9

          Trying to understand you. So Trump has committed serial sexual assaults, but anyone that says he's sexually assaulted them is a liar and probably put up to it by the Democratic Party?

          • leweb
            +4

            You guys are aware that you're feeding a troll, right? I bet you are but in case it's not obvious...

          • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
            +3

            Not "probably".

            You are aware why argue?

            • AdelleChattre
              +7

              Why do you think it's impossible for any of Trump's molestation victims to come forward? You don't think he does anything to them, afterward, do you?

            • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
              -2
              @AdelleChattre -

              I was wrong:

              I credited you with some political savvy, and an ounce of honesty.

            • AdelleChattre
              +2
              @MAGISTERLUDI -

              Not sure you should be looking around at others for the dishonesty here.

            • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
              0
              @AdelleChattre -

              "Not sure",

              of course.

            • AdelleChattre (edited 7 years ago)
              +7
              @MAGISTERLUDI -

              So when do Trump's molestation victims become liars? When he molests them, if and when they step forward, or just when you'd rather they stay silent?

            • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
              +2
              @AdelleChattre -

              When it is established they are actual "victims",

              they're not even a parade, decided by coincidence to step forward together at the same time?

              LOL

              You know very well what this is, everyone does, why pretend otherwise?...Stop the nonsense!........ nuttin more be said.

            • [Deleted Profile]

              [This comment was removed]

            • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
              -1
              @ -

              All in the same day?

              I should think Hillary would have empathy for Donald and strike out against these "nuts and sluts".

              "It seems to me that you have zero clues as to how scared most women are to speak out when they are assaulted by a man with power."

              Yep, Hillary exacerbated/cemented just that with operations and investigations she initiated under the label of my above included quote.

            • AdelleChattre
              +7
              @MAGISTERLUDI -

              What do you want to do? Examine them for handprints? Some people would assume that for everything we know about, there are however many more we don't yet. It seems to me your defense of Trump's molestation and gaslighting is based on your absolute, willful ignorance. You've decided, without knowing what you're talking about, to throw in with this creep at his rapey creepiest.

  • rti9
    +11

    I have recently watched the film Spotlight. The story talks about how the Boston Globe uncovers the church´s scheme to silence thousands of cases of child abuse perpetrated by catholic priests. I wonder how many people questioned at the time (around 2001) when the news got out how it looked suspicious how many victims appeared "out of nowhere". I wonder how many people claimed that the church would never be involved with sexual abuse on children and it was all a conspiracy to sell more papers. I wonder how many of those children were ridiculed and ostracized when they tried to tell the truth. I wonder how many ended their lives and how many were strong enough to keep their sanity.

    I like to think of myself as someone fairly courageous, but I have no idea what I would do if I was in their shoes. Spotlight. What a great movie.

  • leweb
    +2

    What did you expect him to do, apologize? Don't we know the guy by now?

  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
    -3

    Hillary should really express empathy for the Don, and strike out against these "nuts and sluts".

    LOL

    • RoamingGnome (edited 7 years ago)
      +7

      I guess the thing that really blows my mind is how anybody can actually defend the actions of Don or Hillary; they are both slimeballs. If you want either one to be POTUS because your belief system simply won't allow you to vote for the other party, that's fine. I understand that thinking. I used to vote a straight Republican ticket many years ago before I became informed, for those exact same reasons, so I get it. But, to defend them is simply delusional. You can not possibly believe that Trump is a good man and should be POTUS. If so, we really are on different levels and don't have much common ground to discuss. I mean, I'm still supporting Trump, but for very different reasons than you.

      • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
        +2

        Saying it, makes it so.

        You win.

        • RoamingGnome
          +6

          Yes, I do win. Because I'm intelligent and informed and the facts support my position. I realize that is a foreign concept to you.

Here are some other snaps you may like...