They're not applying title II in its entirety. Also this is not about net neutrality, it's about stopping providers blocking cities rights to provide their own service. Read the article.
Yes, I have read it. I don't post links to articles I haven't read. That was not the main thrust of the article. Look here for the full ruling http://www.fcc.gov/d...rotect-open-internet
What care I "the main thrust"? My comment is relevant to content, and would matter not if not. If you don't like it, tough, I live not by your cares/rules There is no reference to licensing or censorship, or to most of Title II contents. Gotta love FCC vagarity.............. I see you have adopted Andy at his best.
They're not applying title II in its entirety. Also this is not about net neutrality, it's about stopping providers blocking cities rights to provide their own service. Read the article.
There is considerable reference to "net neutrality" contained in the article, have you read it? Which part(s) of title II will not be utilized?
Yes, I have read it. I don't post links to articles I haven't read. That was not the main thrust of the article. Look here for the full ruling http://www.fcc.gov/d...rotect-open-internet
What care I "the main thrust"? My comment is relevant to content, and would matter not if not. If you don't like it, tough, I live not by your cares/rules There is no reference to licensing or censorship, or to most of Title II contents. Gotta love FCC vagarity.............. I see you have adopted Andy at his best.