I agree. I don't like how the article has a "Diaz was completely innocent" feel to it. I'm not saying he deserved to be shot but it's not like he was a model citizen. Yes he was unarmed, but how did the officers know that? How did they know if he was reaching for something?
I agree. I don't like how the article has a "Diaz was completely innocent" feel to it. I'm not saying he deserved to be shot but it's not like he was a model citizen. Yes he was unarmed, but how did the officers know that? How did they know if he was reaching for something?