Editorialized headline. OP's ad lib:
This is what is planning on running for U.S. senate
I would say the emphasis was mine, but I wouldn't want to claim any credit which is rightfully OP's.
I was not referring to her as a "what", in terms of her transgender. Of course you took it there. I was referring to the type of person she is as "what" she is. Thank you for clering that up.
Of course you took it there.
No, I hadn't. You are. Or, for the pronominally-challenged, "What are."
Editorialized headline. OP's ad lib:
I would say the emphasis was mine, but I wouldn't want to claim any credit which is rightfully OP's.
I was not referring to her as a "what", in terms of her transgender. Of course you took it there. I was referring to the type of person she is as "what" she is. Thank you for clering that up.
No, I hadn't. You are. Or, for the pronominally-challenged, "What are."