Raymond Wheeler? Is this your "straw man argument" ?
Let me get this straight: you don’t even read your own sources either?
They can "have it both ways".
It’s inquiry, which you seem to’ve confused with heresy.
State your rebut with substance, to my initial offerings if you can. ... Focus. ......Your opinions/bias are known.
By "substance" I guess I need to explain in your case,= an ingredient of fact
To be specific, rebut my statement: (1) the rate of temperature rise is the same as previous warming periods
(2) When claims/facts of popular climatology are debunked, do you not question climatologist's credibility?
Please try to focus.
Let me get this straight: you don’t even read your own sources either?
It’s inquiry, which you seem to’ve confused with heresy.
State your rebut with substance, to my initial offerings if you can. ... Focus. ......Your opinions/bias are known.
By "substance" I guess I need to explain in your case,= an ingredient of fact
To be specific, rebut my statement: (1) the rate of temperature rise is the same as previous warming periods
(2) When claims/facts of popular climatology are debunked, do you not question climatologist's credibility?
Please try to focus.