Raymond Wheeler? Is this your "straw man argument" ?
I'm sure one could find a historic climate chart/graph that may well support popular climate theses, but that would not be the "consensus". LOL
As to the NASA findings, I interjected that to display a top level climate study agency that promoted an erroneous narrative for decades. After their finding, they launch a version of why the contrary facts support the same narrative. ..This has been done by Climatologists many a time. They can "have it both ways".
Raymond Wheeler? Is this your "straw man argument" ?
I'm sure one could find a historic climate chart/graph that may well support popular climate theses, but that would not be the "consensus". LOL
As to the NASA findings, I interjected that to display a top level climate study agency that promoted an erroneous narrative for decades. After their finding, they launch a version of why the contrary facts support the same narrative. ..This has been done by Climatologists many a time. They can "have it both ways".
Let me get this straight: you don’t even read your own sources either?
It’s inquiry, which you seem to’ve confused with heresy.
State your rebut with substance, to my initial offerings if you can. ... Focus. ......Your opinions/bias are known.
By "substance" I guess I need to explain in your case,= an ingredient of fact
To be specific, rebut my statement: (1) the rate of temperature rise is the same as previous warming periods
(2) When claims/facts of popular climatology are debunked, do you not question climatologist's credibility?
Please try to focus.