I love it when the supposed 'rational truth seekers' react with the same knee jerk nonsense as conservatives. The NYTimes article was not 'false equivalency' it was an explanatory peace about why many in the Republican party don't believe in climate change, it not a support piece for them or their position.
Turns out that this leading climate scientist turns out to be practically illiterate when it comes to his capacity for reading.
What a joke the liberal left in the USA continues to be.
It’s great you knew who Joe Romm is. A minor quibble with your comment, though: it isn’t the ‘liberal left’ that’s on the other side of Republican Party dogma here. It’s the rest of the species. Let that sink in.
I love it when the supposed 'rational truth seekers' react with the same knee jerk nonsense as conservatives. The NYTimes article was not 'false equivalency' it was an explanatory peace about why many in the Republican party don't believe in climate change, it not a support piece for them or their position.
Turns out that this leading climate scientist turns out to be practically illiterate when it comes to his capacity for reading.
What a joke the liberal left in the USA continues to be.
It’s great you knew who Joe Romm is. A minor quibble with your comment, though: it isn’t the ‘liberal left’ that’s on the other side of Republican Party dogma here. It’s the rest of the species. Let that sink in.