I think your comment was probably mangled in the editor. All that's showing here is a sentence fragment without so much as a verb phrase. The 'LOL' came through okay, but deprived of any kind of meaning to attach to it, seems a little hollow.
Gotta say, though, Chucklehead, I'm not really seeing what was so laugh-out-loud funny about your comment that you cracked yourself up. I mean, seeing as how you had no idea what you were talking about, hadn't read the article or had any idea what it might've said, and had no meaning in mind for your comment beyond a resentful grunt.
Just a bunch of hicks.
LOL
I think your comment was probably mangled in the editor. All that's showing here is a sentence fragment without so much as a verb phrase. The 'LOL' came through okay, but deprived of any kind of meaning to attach to it, seems a little hollow.
Nope, it wasn't "mangled in the editor".
LOL
What then does the phrase "Just a bunch of hicks" have to do with Dawn Potter's piece here?
The obvious is so opaque, for some.
For you alone, here it is: The working class rural=hicks, by your ilk.
LOL
Did you read the article this time?
"Same ole shit, another day."
LOL
I can see why you wouldn't've bothered to read the article before commenting. It is, like, nine whole paragraphs long.
You can't rile me,
it's "your demeanor" that's on display.
LOL
Gotta say, though, Chucklehead, I'm not really seeing what was so laugh-out-loud funny about your comment that you cracked yourself up. I mean, seeing as how you had no idea what you were talking about, hadn't read the article or had any idea what it might've said, and had no meaning in mind for your comment beyond a resentful grunt.