• MAGISTERLUDI
    +1
    @AdelleChattre -

    Sometimes it's better to keep one's thoughts to themselves.

    Obviously this is not such a time for you. But you could not have picked a subject more delightful than

    myself.

  • AdelleChattre
    +4
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    Ask around. See how many people here feel that way. Can’t wait to see what number you’d say you came up with. Three to five million, maybe?

  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
    +1
    @AdelleChattre -

    Oh, I'm sure I could get hundreds of millions, perhaps billions to agree,

    "Sometimes it's better to keep one's thoughts to themselves."

    You should try it.

  • AdelleChattre
    +4
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    Oh, I can tell you’ve really reconnected with lost friends lately. And here I thought you’d driven that one away long ago, right along with so many other users. Well, you know how the old saying goes: if at first you don’t succeed, get super-creepy.

  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
    +2
    @AdelleChattre -

    You seem deeply concerned about my, I guess I could only term as, status here among not my, but your peers.

    The problem with that is I would have to ,myself, draw some sort of validation from you/them. Haven't I made it perfectly clear, validation is not your's or their's to grant?

  • AdelleChattre
    +3
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    Yes, it’s clear yours is a self-stroking ego, blissfully unaware of any social cues or even simple, human societal expectations. No doubt that’s how you’ve managed to ooze so much contempt.

  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
    +2
    @AdelleChattre -

    I think it's more to your perception of status in the overall realm of real/actual thingys.

    Yours is obviously extravagant

    mine, conventional.

  • AdelleChattre
    +2
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    That comment’s not meant for me, is it? That’s a private thing for your poetry chapbook, I suppose. That kind of high brow stuff makes me dizzy. What’s it about? Vindictiveness, maybe?

  • MAGISTERLUDI
    +1
    @AdelleChattre -

    It was in response, meant I suppose for anyone to peruse, as would be the nature of posts.

    Yep, it was pretty "highbrow" esp the reference to "thingys" might be beyond most to grasp.

    Your free to make it, and have, about what you will/must.

    The thing I most admire about you is, your ability to drive light hearted banter into

    ritualistic cruelty. LOL

  • AdelleChattre
    +3
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    “Thingys,” was it? I don’t remember that specifically. I’ll have to go back and see if you’ve ninja-edited that comment. And, yes, you have. I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise. Light-hearted banter, really? That may be our problem. That’s not at all how I remember thingys. Maybe we didn’t see your asinine, prideful, bigoted, gay-bashing anti-joke in quite the same terms, for instance, then. Perhaps if we’d been able to take social cues, or change our point of view in the slightest fucking degree, or thrive on anything but sneering contempt for everything beyond the range of our nose, your feelings wouldn’t be quite so at-risk, nor your nose so absurdly out of joint.

    • MAGISTERLUDI
      0
      @AdelleChattre -

      Have it anyway you wish

      Good morning to you.