• ttubravesrock
    +5

    Here's where my ignorance of the full issue becomes apparent.

    1. Is the grant available for playground resurfacing (meet safety requirements), or is it a general school grant that the preschool said they wanted to use for playground resurfacing?

    If this grant is pointed towards meeting current safety requirements, then I'm in support of the SC decision. If it's just a general grant for schools, I have more questions.

    • [Deleted Profile] (edited 6 years ago)

      [This comment was removed]

    • AdelleChattre
      +4

      Huh. To me, if it’s about safety then you’re not using recycled tires for playgrounds anyway. Regardless of whether there’s some pretense that flammable, cut up, old vulcanized rubber tires are something we need to make a bigger part of everybody’s childhood, for ‘safety’ reasons, what seems critical here is legally requiring states to fund religion.

      • ttubravesrock
        +5

        The safety angle is important to me because if that's the driver behind this grant, I feel it should be open to any playground accessible to more than two families. It shouldn't matter whether or not it's at a church/mosque, neighborhood, hospital, daycare, public school, nunnery, etc.

        Regarding recycled tire playgrounds, I think we should wait until this study is completed before assessing the safety. (Also, if this is a safety grant, it shouldn't be granted until that study is completed.)

        • AdelleChattre
          +3

          Yeah, I'm sure Trump's crack science teams are working day in and day out to put the teeth in "watchdog" agencies like the EPA. Because who would side with tire fire tycoons over the kids, right? Give me a fucking break. "Study" my ass.

        • ttubravesrock
          +3
          @AdelleChattre -

          woah now... I'm not trying to make you angry!

        • AdelleChattre
          +5
          @ttubravesrock -

          Forgive me if I seemed mad at you. It’s just that I’m not entirely sure we should be expecting either scrupulous science or courageous policy from the Trump Administration.