Maybe they aren't pulling their punches, but their punches hit pretty weak to begin with.

And yet, you felt compelled to respond to the article not by arguing their claims but by slandering the site. Interesting. Weak, you say?

Both have which have more immediate bearing than the race and gender of the candidates, because working on either of the former would address issues in the latter.

I don't disagree at all but I'm curious as to what you mean by this. Please, elaborate.

I have little time and patience for the petulant shrieking of the perpetually offended.

Thank you, I needed that laugh. :)