DayZ is a real heart breaker. I've wanted to get into a game like that for a long time, but it's development is just so bad. Breaking Point has actually managed to surpass DayZ in content as a mod for Arma3. :/
I'm not as bothered by Early Access games as most, but I tend to read whether a game is a safe by or not well. Generally, I end up feeling like I've bought a game, and there's just a lot of post-support for it. Darkest Dungeons and Ark: Survival Evolved are two that come to mind as amazingly playable games as is, that have dev teams pouring a lot of attention into them.
Breaking Point is great considering it is a free mod. It isn't without issue. I do like seeing forward progress and a lot of the features that BP has, such as Legions.
If you've got the hardware to handle it, I would say yes, and of course the game's better if you have a group to play with...being a survival game similar to Rust. There are updates from devs on a very regular basis, a lot of communication, the game is very functional, and it's a good bit of fun. For an example, they did a fairly large change to taming just recently, the community really didn't like the changes, and in less than an hour they'd already tweaked it.
I'm trying to force my 560ti to handle it (when the game's low graphics preset says it's for a 770), so I'm stuck playing at 25fps most of the time. :P
DayZ is a real heart breaker. I've wanted to get into a game like that for a long time, but it's development is just so bad. Breaking Point has actually managed to surpass DayZ in content as a mod for Arma3. :/
I'm not as bothered by Early Access games as most, but I tend to read whether a game is a safe by or not well. Generally, I end up feeling like I've bought a game, and there's just a lot of post-support for it. Darkest Dungeons and Ark: Survival Evolved are two that come to mind as amazingly playable games as is, that have dev teams pouring a lot of attention into them.
Breaking Point is great considering it is a free mod. It isn't without issue. I do like seeing forward progress and a lot of the features that BP has, such as Legions.
Is ARK worth the price tag is the given state?
If you've got the hardware to handle it, I would say yes, and of course the game's better if you have a group to play with...being a survival game similar to Rust. There are updates from devs on a very regular basis, a lot of communication, the game is very functional, and it's a good bit of fun. For an example, they did a fairly large change to taming just recently, the community really didn't like the changes, and in less than an hour they'd already tweaked it.
I'm trying to force my 560ti to handle it (when the game's low graphics preset says it's for a 770), so I'm stuck playing at 25fps most of the time. :P
Thanks! Finally upgraded to a GTX 980, so I'd better be able to handle it!