LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+58 58 0
Published 3 years ago with 4 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • spaceghoti
    +7

    The original source didn't give a reason why Breivik was being held in isolation so I went digging. Not a lot of people are addressing it, but I eventually found a quick blurb at the end of the Reuters article:

    The head of Ila prison outside Oslo, a facility where Breivik was previously held, said in 2013 that holding him in isolation was necessary because of the risk he could take someone hostage.

    I'm not sure I buy that reasoning. Isn't the whole point of keeping someone in prison so you can maintain security over them? Keep them from hurting others? What hostage is he likely to use in prison and has he already attempted it?

    • bkool
      +4

      I don't buy it either.

      • Jambears
        +4

        At the same time I don't feel terribly bad for the guy

Here are some other snaps you may like...