parent
  • FivesandSevens
    +4

    Great point. I use emoticons in that way too (much to my teenagers' chagrin) and often struggle with the connotation of immaturity that comes along with them. I sometimes end up rewriting simple messages just to avoid using them. But sometimes '/s' isn't enough, or even applicable.

    • hallucigenia
      +2

      But sometimes '/s' isn't enough, or even applicable.

      "/s" is terrible. The whole point of sarcasm is that it's inferred. You don't call out sarcasm, just like you don't explain a joke. It ruins it. If you can't be sarcastic without using /s, then don't be sarcastic.

      • FivesandSevens (edited 8 years ago)
        +2

        I agree. Unfortunately, in my experience some people just can't or won't infer the sarcastic intent in what most people can see is a clearly sarcastic comment. They tend to get all worked up, and then I feel bad. So the few times I have used "/s" online have been out of an abundance of caution.

        Edit: I want to add that I brought up "/s" in my comment above because it is a known alternative to an emoticon, not because I think it's awesome.

      • imnotgoats (edited 8 years ago)
        +2
        @FivesandSevens -

        Yeah, I think sarcasm is one of the forms that fares the least well in writing.

      • hallucigenia (edited 8 years ago)
        +2
        @FivesandSevens -

        There are a lot of people who don't get that the Onion is a parody, either, but the Onion doesn't start each article with "DISCLAIMER: The following is satire and is not intended to be taken seriously. The events described here are fictional and included for comedic purposes." Why? Two reasons: 1) It wouldn't be as funny anymore, and 2) the fact that stupid people are taking it seriously is hilarious.