if the total cost still ends up being similar to what we have come to expect and the content is still all there is it really a bad thing for a player who plays half the game to pay 35 dollars and the player who plays 100% to pay 70?
except I don't see that being the case, I think that game prices are gonna double or triple from it.
if the total cost still ends up being similar to what we have come to expect and the content is still all there is it really a bad thing for a player who plays half the game to pay 35 dollars and the player who plays 100% to pay 70?
except I don't see that being the case, I think that game prices are gonna double or triple from it.