LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • eilyra

    Well, it kind of does. Not in the internet points kind of sense, but if it ends up being used frivolously rather than with the purposes set in the etiquette, it may end up changing the character of the discussion. So while the single downvote might not carry weight in this particular instance, maintaining the notion that they do carry weight and are consequential and as such should be used responsibly does carry merit. One possible way of doing this is requesting further clarification in cases where the downvote hasn't been obviously warranted.