LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica

If you could change anything about the American presidency elections process, what would it be?

11 months ago by 8mm with 7 comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • spaceghoti

    I would fix our electoral system to end first-past-the-gate voting. We could end the two party lock on our politics that we've created.

  • ChrisTyler

    Instead of the debates, which are a complete waste of time, I would require that both nominees and any viable third party candidate (if there ever is one) appear (separately) before both the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Appropriations.

  • Yamadori

    Gerrymandering needs to go. First and foremost.

    Institutionalized fact checking. It would be a non-partisan body that would try to be as unbiased as possible while reigning in the wild claims of candidates. A centralized bank of ideas and truth. It would penalize repeating a lie.

    I'd also love to see centralized government website that candidates can post their platforms and proposed budgets to. Featuring a direct comparison of candidates, and a function where you could plug in your own personal information and values and it would show how well the candidates align. It would of course need to be open source, and agreed upon by both sides to reduce bias.

  • NinjaKlaus

    Right this minute today, if I can only choose one thing it would be ending endorsements, I've spent more time watching the news cover who's endorsing or not endorsing who than hearing platform ideas... not that either had a platform they wanted to actually explain and talk about.

    If I get more choices I also want to end the electoral college and go to the actual vote.

  • Appaloosa

    I'm not so sure the presidential election process is what the problem is. Look at what is to be elected upon today. The president is the by-product of a two party system that is now thoroughly corrupted by special interest groups, supported by lobbyists who in many cases are ex-government lawmakers. By the time a presidential election occurs, the best scum has risen to the top and that is what you are forced to choose, the less toxic of two scum. What needs to change happens way before that time.