parent
  • xg549
    +5

    Ex-christian here from a heavily religious background, had a lot of time to ponder my beliefs after leaving the church. My personal philosophy as of now is that I believe there is a god merely for the sake of creation. I do not believe that it is mathematically sound enough that as science suggest everything could have happened just perfectly so. The probability is not too low for life to form, no, but for everything to then develop into such to coherent ecosystem where its such a perfect intertwined puzzle? I think something had to dictate what happened there and why.

    That said, that's the only credibility I give towards a deity. I don't think that such a god has any interest in interacting with humanity. I don't think the god that may exist under my belief has been accurately depicted by christians or any other human religion that ever has or ever will exist. I don't think that understanding gods is something we are capable of, which why a lot of people end up like you, it doesn't make sense and it's not supposed to. But to come back around to your point, I suppose my "evidence" would be the creation of the universe and of life on earth. Not out of any benevolent purpose like christians might believe, perhaps out of no purpose at all, but I don't see any other way that it could happen other than intentionally.