LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
parent
  • Tempest
    +3

    If having no unique quality means that I have the most unique quality, it would mean that I do have a unique quality after all, which would negate the fact that I have THE most unique quality. Therefore, I wouldn't have the most unique quality, and since I don't have any other unique qualities, that would mean that I have no unique quality, which would mean that I have THE most unique quality, but then again, we've come to the conclusion that having the most unique quality means that I do have a unique quality after all and... and... I need to lie down.