I actually concede your point on the wages deal, at least for the easily-replaceable workers. The higher-ups (the people that I was mostly considering when I wrote that) have it much nicer, however, but that's a given for pretty much all businesses. I do maintain the last two statements.
If that's not straightforward, then why is the opposite straightforward? Or do you disagree that poor economic conditions = a harder life for the average Joe? It makes perfect sense to me, I'm just a little confused on how you see it. I'm saying that a good economy = better lives for the people. So, as I see it, you could say that what makes the economy better by extension makes life better.
I actually concede your point on the wages deal, at least for the easily-replaceable workers. The higher-ups (the people that I was mostly considering when I wrote that) have it much nicer, however, but that's a given for pretty much all businesses. I do maintain the last two statements.
If that's not straightforward, then why is the opposite straightforward? Or do you disagree that poor economic conditions = a harder life for the average Joe? It makes perfect sense to me, I'm just a little confused on how you see it. I'm saying that a good economy = better lives for the people. So, as I see it, you could say that what makes the economy better by extension makes life better.