But with this logic, both may die. There is nothing stating that the other is alive if one is dead, only that if one lives the other is definitely dead.
For further clarification. If Harry is dead, it doesn't mean that Voldemort has to be alive and done it. Harry could have been mauled by a hippogriff (or w/e) and it wouldn't be proof of Voldemort's aliveness. It just means that Harry is dead.
It applies logic, but its flawed. It follows:
If H lives, then V dies.
If V lives, then H dies.
But with this logic, both may die. There is nothing stating that the other is alive if one is dead, only that if one lives the other is definitely dead.
For further clarification. If Harry is dead, it doesn't mean that Voldemort has to be alive and done it. Harry could have been mauled by a hippogriff (or w/e) and it wouldn't be proof of Voldemort's aliveness. It just means that Harry is dead.