9 years ago
Daylights and Nightlights
The problem is that splitting hairs is necessary when you’re trying to suggest your ancient book contains scientific knowledge that human beings couldn’t possibly know at the time so therefore it is information that came straight from a god. These things absolutely do matter when someone is claiming 100% scientific accuracy. I will give a couple examples.
Continue Reading
http://dirtyatheist.tumblr.com
-
Theists: Your "evidence" isn't evidence. Here's why.
Join the Discussion