Will be interesting to see how this unfolds, especially given the complexity of this case in the jurys eyes.

What if all this is actually true?

In his opening statement in a Manhattan courtroom, defense attorney Joshua Dratel began with a surprising admission: that his client Ross Ulbricht was in fact the founder of the Silk Road. But Dratel went on to explain that the site was meant merely to be a kind of “economic experiment” that Ulbricht only controlled for a brief time. The eventual adoptive owners of the Silk Road, Dratel claimed, would later trick Ulbricht into serving as the “fall guy” when they sensed an impending law enforcement crackdown.

Seriously, a five-year-old can come up with a better defense than that. I guess being caught red handed with an un-encrypted laptop, logs of transactions and witnesses that can testify against you doesn't really keep too many options open.