+58 58 0
Published 8 years ago by rti9 with 3 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Urgz
    +3

    An interesting move. It seems reasonable if you read the article. I'm curious how this will turn out for them in the long.

    • racerxonclar
      +2

      It seems really strange to me. I get their point... they've been competing with a market that beats them in pretty much every way... but, trying to shift your market to glamour/sexy photoshoots doesn't seem like a fix to me. Sure there's less competition in that market, but it's vastly smaller.

      Either way, safe to say Hell dropped a few degrees as Playboy stopped being a titty magazine lol

      • Urgz
        +1

        With so much competition, like you put it nicely that beat them pretty much in every way, their current readers must not be reading it for the nude pictures anymore. I agree that the shift to glamour/sexy photoshoots is not going to be a fix, but it probably won't lead too much less readers either then. It will probably lower the costs of these shoots but I don't know how much that really matters. So then it's the question, what's part 2 of the strategy, that's going to get them a large number of new readers and especially keeps the brand (and the bunny logo) alive?

Here are some other snaps you may like...