+16 16 0
Published 7 years ago by rexall with 4 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
    +2

    Hardly a "phantom enemy"(this author has provided sufficient examples), and akin to the "racism" label, they're the proverbial "old horse(s)"

    the left has ridden to their "death".

    • AdelleChattre
      +4

      Hardly a “phantom enemy”

      Can you find an instance of someone taking a stand for “political correctness” as such? Hint: Even the author credited with developing the term was arguing against it.

      this author has provided sufficient examples

      I take it you’re talking about yourself, here. This is puzzling, because I see a lot of your comments and the term “PC” only seems to come up when somebody calls you out for your usual charm. If anyone was to try to work out what “PC” meant from the way you use it, it’d mean the same as "SJW," which is to say “non-ignorant, non-bigoted.”

      and akin to the “racism” label, they’re the proverbial “old horse(s)”

      What? You’ve got it in for swayback nags now? Not completely surprised, actually. Why should they have it easy?

      the left has ridden to their “death”.

      Is this mixing the horses metaphor or are we just trying to frighten children now?

      • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 7 years ago)
        +2

        Your allusions are nothing

        if not,,,,amusing. ;-)

  • ttubravesrock
    +2

    I did read through the entire article through the course of my work day's breaks.

    I won't argue the author's point that nobody is lobbying strictly for 'political correctness,' but to flip the straw man argument around, pro-choice individuals aren't lobbying strictly for 'killing babies,' and that's how pro-life people see it.

    The author is whiny and biased; and that made reading the article an arduous task.

Here are some other snaps you may like...