hmm... the family was charged for damages because the pool was emptied and out of use for two days, but they refused to pay based on the grounds that the pool was never emptied or out of use. I wonder which one is lying. I'm guessing the non-Muslims in this case, but it should be pretty easy to prove.
hmm... the family was charged for damages because the pool was emptied and out of use for two days, but they refused to pay based on the grounds that the pool was never emptied or out of use. I wonder which one is lying. I'm guessing the non-Muslims in this case, but it should be pretty easy to prove.