Thank you
Your email has been added to our waiting list and we will send an invite to you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
In the meantime, if you happen to run a blog, our newly launched Blog Enhancement Suite can utilize the immense power of community to help you get more audience, engagement, content, and revenue with your own embeddable community! It will breathe new life into your blog and can automate many of the tedious tasks that come with the territory, so you can focus more on what matters most... writing.
Help spread the word about Snapzu:
Let others know about Snapzu by tweeting about us. We appreciate every mention!
Tweet it!
http://www.bbc.com
Join the Discussion
I'm personally not too happy with the fact the article mentions twice or thrice that it won't cause cancer, but has less focus on the biodiversity argument. I mean, the article admits it reduces biodiversity -- so why not expand on that? Why not mention what effects that has in the long run, besides resistance from plants? What will this reduction in biodiversity mean for the surrounding areas, for example?