I recently read where the FBI told anybody that would listen this is not about setting a precedent, it's about Homeland Security. Then in the next few pages of the article it went on to talk about upwards of 12 attorney generals in various states and the Department of Justice have been looking for a precedent for years because they have tons of backlogged iPhones that can't be hacked into.
Something like 51% of Americans are siding with the FBI right now according to that same article. I just wonder how these same people would feel if they needed to give a key to every door lock so that just in case it could be used. Why give up digital privacy and defend physical privacy so vehemently, what's the deal here?
I recently read where the FBI told anybody that would listen this is not about setting a precedent, it's about Homeland Security. Then in the next few pages of the article it went on to talk about upwards of 12 attorney generals in various states and the Department of Justice have been looking for a precedent for years because they have tons of backlogged iPhones that can't be hacked into.
Something like 51% of Americans are siding with the FBI right now according to that same article. I just wonder how these same people would feel if they needed to give a key to every door lock so that just in case it could be used. Why give up digital privacy and defend physical privacy so vehemently, what's the deal here?