LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • AdelleChattre

    This review won't wear well with time. Reviewers often seem to've seen some completely different movie than whichever one we've seen. Rarely, though, does one see a reviewer fail to get a movie so completely that they'd have the arrogance to step in front of a train like this guy does. Maybe when I was failing to get the times table as a kid I should've claimed "giant plothole, no new romances, no hope." It's not Proust, it's a capeshit tentpole. It's not like anyone asked the reviewer here to do long division in Roman numerals.