LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+2 2 0
Published 3 years ago with 1 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • septimine
    +1

    I see a couple of problems with the approach.

    First, I think moves like this will accelerate the move to temp positions. If all Walmart associates making less than 20k a year suddenly become temps, they won't owe the taxes for not paying a living wage. Not because those people are making a good living, but because they work for a different company which contracts with Walmart. You've essentially made the problem worse by ending the perk of actually being employed by the company you work for -- permanent positions. Temps don't know if they'll have a job next month, they don't even necessarily know where they'll work that day. Essentially, I think such a move will turn service employment into day-labor where you exit as a nomad going from place to place depending on who needs work that day. Forget dreaming of a living wage, they'll line up in hopes of getting a few hours of work that day, and at any time day or night because they're competing with other temps for those hours.

    Second, I think that it would destroy demand for unskilled laborers. When wages go up, the workers with little experience or skill have a harder time getting their first job. And at even $10 an hour, employers are pretty picky. By $11 an hour, they want a college grad to stock shelves. If "living wage" is more than that, then anyone with less than a four year degree can pretty much give up on getting a job anymore. He isn't worth that much to the company without more specific skills, so instead of him getting a prt time minimum wage job that pays part of his living, he's wholly dependent on the taxpayers. In a sense these "bad employers" are performing a service by providing the marginally employable some money so that the government doesn't have to pay the whole thing.

Here are some other snaps you may like...