+38 38 0
Published 9 years ago by imokruok with 15 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
Conversation 9 comments by 5 users
  • MAGISTERLUDI
    -1

    Most unfortunate, many influential leaders and celebrities, with their recent comments and displays have set the tenor for just such incidents.

    • 902102213
      +5

      No.. cops getting away with murdering unarmed innocent people. like sleeping 6 year old kids, or 12 year olds with toy guns is what set the tenor for these kind of incidents.

      • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 9 years ago)
        +3

        The shooter of the 12 year old has not gotten away with it, he was indicted. Please reference your shooting of sleeping 6 year olds by by cops, (I could not find them) I would appreciate an update.

        • [Deleted Profile]

          [This comment was removed]

    • imokruok
      +4

      Agreed most unfortunate. But to say "leaders" and "celebrities" set the tenor for violence and retaliation is akin to blaming video games or that hip hop music the whippersnappers get jiggy with.

  • 902102213
    +5

    Chickens coming home to roost...

    • drunkenninja
      +2

      Well put.

    • MAGISTERLUDI
      +1

      "Chickens coming home to roost ". So any police officer is fair game. You are a sick person.

      • drunkenninja (edited 9 years ago)
        +3

        Actually, there are multiple ways that statement can be interpreted. My interpretation is that once a specific threshold of police misconduct, violence against citizens and the general injustice by the court system has been reached something equally unjust and violent will usually happen to the opposing side. Its not "Fair game on all police officers", its a simple statement of "What comes around, goes around".

        • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 9 years ago)
          +1

          Both those expressions refer to the perpetrators, not a shared occupation. What is anyone's "specific threshold of police misconduct"? Without quantification it just seems nebulous rhetoric. Your interpretation is the basis to my initial post.

Here are some other snaps you may like...