Interesting headline, but the article was relatively poorly written. For example, no mention was made of job sectors which are particularly at-risk for technology replacement in 10 years, nor, conversely, job sectors that you would expect to be low-risk for technology replacement e.g. plumbers, senior health care aides, etc. Instead there was more fluff than substance in the article.
Interesting headline, but the article was relatively poorly written. For example, no mention was made of job sectors which are particularly at-risk for technology replacement in 10 years, nor, conversely, job sectors that you would expect to be low-risk for technology replacement e.g. plumbers, senior health care aides, etc. Instead there was more fluff than substance in the article.