5 years ago
People are “consistently inconsistent” in how they reason about controversial scientific topics
There are various issues on which there is a scientific consensus but great public controversy, such as anthropogenic climate change and the safety of vaccines. One previously popular explanation for this mismatch was that an information deficit among the public is to blame. Give people all the facts and then, according to this perspective, the public will catch up with the scientists. Yet time and again, that simply hasn’t happened.
Continue Reading
https://digest.bps.org.uk
Join the Discussion