LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+21 21 0
Published 1 year ago with 1 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • NinjaKlaus

    "these solutions are absolutely affordable, especially given the sinking costs of wind and solar power."

    That's all it says for cost, sure you can call it affordable if you want but I can't afford the cost of Solar on my home, and it's crazy to claim it's affordable to build out a network for the entire country that isn't going to cost a lot to roll out, and by a lot we're probably talking trillions. I already have to cut back on electric use because I'm now paying more and more every year for a nuclear plant I didn't ask for that is a hundred years behind schedule with skyrocketing costs.

    I like the California approach by requiring it on new construction though and would support that anywhere.

Here are some other snaps you may like...