Am I the only one that thinks the United States should be doing more to address the underlying causes of the refugees by taking out ISIS (not just doing airstrikes), instead of taking in refugees? These refugees are going to become a huge burden on the social programs the United States has.
Am I the only one that thinks the United States should be doing more to address the underlying causes of the refugees by taking out ISIS (not just doing airstrikes), instead of taking in refugees? These refugees are going to become a huge burden on the social programs the United States has.
Unless ISIS is currently serving an unknown political function. (?) IDK just a thought. (seems that way due to lack of aggressive US response)