+23 24 1
Published 7 years ago by everlost with 3 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • NinjaKlaus
    +5

    I'd like to know who paid for this study. Doing some research and even though the National Academies has a nice official sounding name they are just a non-profit organization. I'm not saying I believe they'll doom us all, I'm just saying I don't know why labeling laws are so hated by certain groups. If people don't want that GMO food, maybe you shouldn't be trying to hide it's GMO and let the market decide. Maybe move your GMO's to places that need food desperately and would gladly accept them, of course not at the profit margins you were wanting though.

    Here is why I ask who is paying them.

    Our work extends well beyond fulfilling federal government requests, however. Foundations, state governments, the private sector, and philanthropy from individuals enable us to address critical issues on behalf of the nation.

    • MNichols
      +5

      "Marion Nestle of New York University, who was a reviewer but not an author of the report, said “the report reveals how little is known about the effects of GE foods”

      This was a quote I found at the bottom of the article. To be completely honest, it's the only one I agree with. Not once did The Guardian link to the actual study by The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine or any articles referencing the study. Every single link in that posts goes to a related page, or a not so related page. This is so disappointing. I feel like I've learned nothing from reading this, other than that people don't want consumers to know about GMOs.

  • MAGISTERLUDI
    -1

    Bill Nye, "your science guy" concurs with this study.

Here are some other snaps you may like...