+26 26 0
Published 7 years ago by doodlegirl with 3 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • leweb
    +3

    Why do you need to remove the rule to re-evaluate which water bodies should be protected? It's like, "we're going to remove the penalties for rape while we re-evaluate who needs to be protected from it".

    • Appaloosa (edited 7 years ago)
      +4

      That title is clickbait. The Waters of the US rule has been a hot point for years. Talk about a failed agency....there are numerous instances of poisoned dinking water, Flint as just one,...under the auspices of the EPA. Whatever they were protecting sure wasn't the drinking water.

      Edit: added more words.

      • leweb
        +3

        It may actually be a good thing to have grown up in a place where the tap water is undrinkable (and that's on the rare occasions when you actually have water coming out of the tap). I never assume that tap water is OK to drink, no matter where I am. It does get me funny looks from people sometimes, but I'd rather get funny looks than lead poisoning, or cholera.

Here are some other snaps you may like...