But, I can't disagree that it comes out of the box with a measure of usability and is "good enough" for lots of people.
This part of my comment really seems to be being misunderstood. I am stating that Windows comes out of the box being able to be used. That's it. Not that it's better or worse than Linux or anything else. Just that it is usable and that that is good enough for plenty of end users, and if it's good enough for them, then who am I to argue?
This part of my comment really seems to be being misunderstood. I am stating that Windows comes out of the box being able to be used. That's it. Not that it's better or worse than Linux or anything else. Just that it is usable and that that is good enough for plenty of end users, and if it's good enough for them, then who am I to argue?