It had happened in some states, but even in many of those states it is still being fought: Mississippi Goddam, for instance. Using the passive voice to say this ‘had happened’ ignores that marriage equality had to fought for and won in state after state. This is what the Supreme Court is for, settling constitutional law for the nation as a whole. If you’re for equality in any particular state, why would you be against it in the country?
It had happened in some states, but even in many of those states it is still being fought: Mississippi Goddam, for instance. Using the passive voice to say this ‘had happened’ ignores that marriage equality had to fought for and won in state after state. This is what the Supreme Court is for, settling constitutional law for the nation as a whole. If you’re for equality in any particular state, why would you be against it in the country?