Article says what it says: there is human global warming, but it might be linear, not accelerating. Whether you misread it or not is your own call. Some people read what they want.
For me it is the most important part, because it is what shapes current and future decisions. If we can do something about global warming with reasonable means and with meaningful results, then we should. However if doing something about it is too expensive, then it might not be worth doing something right now.
And this article, by saying that a substantial part of warming is not related to human activities decreased the potential result of doing something about global warming.
Article says what it says: there is human global warming, but it might be linear, not accelerating. Whether you misread it or not is your own call. Some people read what they want.
For me it is the most important part, because it is what shapes current and future decisions. If we can do something about global warming with reasonable means and with meaningful results, then we should. However if doing something about it is too expensive, then it might not be worth doing something right now.
And this article, by saying that a substantial part of warming is not related to human activities decreased the potential result of doing something about global warming.