Woowoo678's feed

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    If I were an advertiser, I wouldn't be very interested either. You can do better than a little link down in the corner for a short amount of time.

  • 10 years ago
    Achievement Woowoo678

    Red Eye Jedi

    Viewed 50/50 snaps! Congratulations Woowoo678 on this achievement!

    +795 XP
  • 10 years ago
    Level Up Woowoo678

    Level 3

    Woowoo678 is now level 3 with 3,135 XP.

     View Unlocks  
    • Pattern Banner You now have the ability to select a pattern for your profile banner.
  • 10 years ago
    Achievement Woowoo678

    Chatter Box

    Posted a total of 10/10 comments! Congratulations Woowoo678 on this achievement!

    +530 XP
  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    Hey, you cheated! You were watching!

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    Someone really dropped the ball here.

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    You lie on the internet, that's what happens! Don't lie on the internet.

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    This article is satire. This never actually happened. This news source is basically another The Onion.

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    Yes, it's from a satirical news site, like The Onion.

  • 10 years ago
    Achievement Woowoo678

    Hat Trick

    Maintained a 3 day login streak 2/2 times! Congratulations Woowoo678 on this achievement!

    +530 XP
  • 10 years ago
    Achievement Woowoo678

    Rock Star

    Followed by 2/2 members! Congratulations Woowoo678 on this achievement!

    +525 XP
  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    "Ad Mongers"? You mean people who want to make some money back for their hard work, which they provide to you for FREE?

    It hardly matters if you're actually going to buy it. If you're not viewing ads, the owners of the sites you're browsing are not getting anything back whatsoever. If you are, you're supporting the people who worked to deliver that content to you, for free, may I reiterate.

    Just because some people want to lose money for the benefit of the public doesn't mean everyone wants to, or CAN do, for that matter.

    "Archaic business model"? What's your alternative? Donations are almost out of the question. Don't rely on people's generosity. The other option is to have to pay to access the content. We don't want that, do we?

    Muting and looking away from TV ads is different. The broadcasters are still gaining ad money, whether or not you're actually looking at the television. If you block ads, the content providers get nothing.

    "Now if you pay me $12,000 a year,I'll look at your ads all you want,otherwise,forget it." You ARE getting paid! Your "payment" is the content that the providers are giving you, again, for no money out of your pocket.

    "At the end of the day,it's my computer,not your computer and I decide what goes on it." Did you write all of these websites yourself? Because I think the creators should have a say in what goes on THEIR pages. Sure, a custom style is okay, but denying them money just so you don't have to see a flashing box is a different matter.

    show moreshow less
  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    Would you rather another business model like, say, having to pay to view their content?

  • 10 years ago
    Comment Woowoo678

    What I would like is if adblock could work on an "Activate for this site" basis, with deactivation as the default. I might consider reinstalling it if it had that. I don't think the whitelist is anywhere near sufficient.