No. Sad Puppies was about showing how there is a clear "in group", and that quality isn't being rewarded. Who you are is. That isn't a good thing. That is unbelievably bad.
http://41.media.tumblr.com/732f809f74b5a88569...a6430d742/tumblr_ntiyyg17bI1rphc69o1_1280.jpg
This is the problem with the Hugo Awards. And this "No Vote" award demonstrated that perfectly.
Then isn't it good it's out in the open now?
Sure, but I took the comment above me as agreement with the article. Which is biased.
No. Sad Puppies was about showing how there is a clear "in group", and that quality isn't being rewarded. Who you are is. That isn't a good thing. That is unbelievably bad.
http://41.media.tumblr.com/732f809f74b5a88569...a6430d742/tumblr_ntiyyg17bI1rphc69o1_1280.jpg
This is the problem with the Hugo Awards. And this "No Vote" award demonstrated that perfectly.
Then isn't it good it's out in the open now?
Sure, but I took the comment above me as agreement with the article. Which is biased.