LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • Ricwulf
    +2

    No. Sad Puppies was about showing how there is a clear "in group", and that quality isn't being rewarded. Who you are is. That isn't a good thing. That is unbelievably bad.

    http://41.media.tumblr.com/732f809f74b5a88569...a6430d742/tumblr_ntiyyg17bI1rphc69o1_1280.jpg

    This is the problem with the Hugo Awards. And this "No Vote" award demonstrated that perfectly.

    • frohawk
      +2

      Then isn't it good it's out in the open now?

      • Ricwulf
        +1

        Sure, but I took the comment above me as agreement with the article. Which is biased.