No. Sad Puppies was about showing how there is a clear "in group", and that quality isn't being rewarded. Who you are is. That isn't a good thing. That is unbelievably bad.
This is the problem with the Hugo Awards. And this "No Vote" award demonstrated that perfectly.
Then isn't it good it's out in the open now?
Sure, but I took the comment above me as agreement with the article. Which is biased.