I totally agree, and would like to see even more granularity down to urban/rural boundaries, or even census tract. Hell, the report hints at metropolitan area income effects, so surely the BEA data is somewhere out there. Otherwise, the rolled-up numbers are potentially going to be misconstrued, especially if such a study gets traction as a vehicle for public policy implications.
I totally agree, and would like to see even more granularity down to urban/rural boundaries, or even census tract. Hell, the report hints at metropolitan area income effects, so surely the BEA data is somewhere out there. Otherwise, the rolled-up numbers are potentially going to be misconstrued, especially if such a study gets traction as a vehicle for public policy implications.