No, I say leave it. You could even replace the main link with the working version I posted as a related link. Bet you could even get that “paywalled” downvote rescinded.
The FT is such a valuable source that their free registration’s no big deal. In cases like this where an article is later made available only to premium subscribers, well after it’s been up, it can still be good knowing about. If the free registration weren’t so cryptic for people, I’d post things from FT all the time.
OK, thanks again! I replaced the main link with the working link that you provided (a very scary note about spammers popped up when I did that!). We'll see what happens.
No, I say leave it. You could even replace the main link with the working version I posted as a related link. Bet you could even get that “paywalled” downvote rescinded.
The FT is such a valuable source that their free registration’s no big deal. In cases like this where an article is later made available only to premium subscribers, well after it’s been up, it can still be good knowing about. If the free registration weren’t so cryptic for people, I’d post things from FT all the time.
OK, thanks again! I replaced the main link with the working link that you provided (a very scary note about spammers popped up when I did that!). We'll see what happens.