+65 65 0
Published 9 years ago by KondoR with 10 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • YourTaxGuy
    +8

    The article doesn't mention that a large number of these "Earths" are much closer to the center of the galaxy than we are, which it appears make it much less likely that life would form there. But even if those are eliminated, it might not be a billion, but certainly in the hundreds of millions.

    • Urmel
      +6

      That's quite interesting.

      Do you mind elaborating why it is more unlikely to find life on planets closer to the centre of the galaxy?

      • YourTaxGuy
        +5

        The two main reasons are 1) the proximity to the black hole at the center of the galaxy would mean a lot of radiation, and 2) the larger number of supernovae closer to the system, would both be catastrophic to planets capable of sustaining life.

        Here's some more about Galactic Habitable Zones.

  • ekyris (edited 9 years ago)
    +5

    For anyone curious about how we determine "Earth-like planets," check out the Earth Similarity Index. The recent discovery from Kepler was very exciting because it has an ESI of 0.98, compared to the previous leader which was 0.89. For comparison, Mars is at a 0.70. Of course, unless we develop some really fancy new tech, these planets are quite unreachable...

    • Urmel
      +4

      I added your wikpedia link to related links

      Let me know, if you want to add it yourself and I will delete it.

      • ekyris
        +3

        Ah good call, I linked the info on Kepler and didn't think of that. You thought of it, keep it posted!

  • walt0ua
    +4

    Now we need to put up a bigger effort to create means for actually locating these worlds.

  • Chubros
    +4

    Thanks guys for the extra links. Very interesting stuff.

  • massani
    +3

    Still waiting for that Mass Effect relay to show itself within Charon...

Here are some other snaps you may like...