A lot of people left reddit because of removal of content, which they viewed as censorship. e.g. /r/fatpeoplehate, TTP content (allegedly) being removed from /r/news. I think most people who left for that reason migrated to voat, because voat is explicitly dedicated to free speech and never removing content, unless law enforcement tells them that the content is illegal. I think on voat, this leads to tons of undesirable and often illegal content being posted, like in /v/jailbait.

But what about Snapzu? What kinds of removal of content do you think is acceptable? The "What is Snapzu" page says "submitted content belongs to users and thus can never be removed," but what if someone starts posting child pornography, or stolen credit card numbers? I think that content should be removed. Although I haven't seen anything like that here, it could eventually become an issue, especially if Snapzu continues to grow.

I don't think that content should be removed just because it is undesirable but I don't think Snapzu should host illegal content.