• Appaloosa (edited 8 years ago)
    +3
    @AdelleChattre -

    "According to Rakesh Khurana of the Harvard Business School (in From Higher Aims to Hired Hands), the first corporation managers came from an industrial engineering background and saw their job as doing for the entire organization what they’d previously done for production on the shop floor. The managerial revolution in the large corporation, Khurana writes, was in essence an attempt to apply the engineer’s approach (standardizing and rationalizing tools, processes, and systems) to the organization as a system.

    And according to Yehouda Shenhav (Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution), Progressivism was the ideology of the managers and engineers who administered the large organizations; political action was a matter of applying the same principles they used to rationalize their organizations to society as a whole. Shenhav writes (quoting Robert Wiebe):"

    Taylorism was absolutely a product of the Progressive era thought process of that time.

    All that means is that not everything in the Progressive movement was good, no more than Cheney, part of the Neocon regime, was good.

    • Appaloosa
      +5
      @Appaloosa -

      And I must apologize to spaceghoti I am deeply sorry for saying that bury brigades followed you.

      Pease accept my apology.