Pro funding doesn't interest you. The Guardian and Greenpeace would be considered just as apolitical? LOL..... If you are so resistant to information, why bother with discussion, it just brings to light alternative data to discredit you and displays your bias(es)........Thank you for the correction, I made the edit. I appreciate all grammatical input, and feel free for spelling as well. Spell check seems to be inclusive on this site, it's never 100% accurate.
Pro funding doesn't interest you. The Guardian and Greenpeace would be considered just as apolitical? LOL..... If you are so resistant to information, why bother with discussion, it just brings to light alternative data to discredit you and displays your bias(es)........Thank you for the correction, I made the edit. I appreciate all grammatical input, and feel free for spelling as well. Spell check seems to be inclusive on this site, it's never 100% accurate.