LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • Jupiter7
    +7

    So they didn't leave because they are part of a terrible "news" site, but because the boss took down their terrible "article"? I'm undecided whether it should have been taken down, but what a shitty reason to leave. I hope Geithner sues the ever loving SHIT out of gawker. Him & Hogan will take them down (hoping Hogan will on his own though if Geithner doesn't join).

    • Bossman
      +5

      I mean, one of the guys leaving is the guy who wrote the shitty article...

    • GeniusIComeAnon
      +3

      I'm not sure if he could sue them. On what grounds would he be able to?